Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7204 14
Original file (NR7204 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
* DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

DIC
Docket No. NR7204-14
10 Mar 15

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

TO: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: —— iii “en —
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments

*(2) NPC memo dtd 20 Jan 15
(3) DEERS printout
(4) Dependency Application/RED (NAVPERS 1070/602) dtd 24 Mar 12
(5) HUNT system printout
(6) DD Form 2656 dtd 16 Feb 13

 

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
to show Petitioner declined enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan
(SBP).

2. The Board, consisting o Ll nd ap
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on

9 March 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. Petitioner ont EP ...- married on 10 November
1991, and divorced on or ou March 2006. See enclosure (3).
c. Petitioner ad ip were married on 1 March 2008.

See enclosure (4).

dad. Petitioner transferred to the Fleet Reserve on 31 July 2013.
See enclosures (5).
Docket No. NR7204-14

e. On or about 1 August 2013, Petitioner was automatically
enrolled in SBP Spouse coverage as a result of the DFAS Cleveland
Center not receiving a valid SBP election (the form was invalid due to
Petitioner failing to complete Block 26). See enclosures (5) and (6).

f. Per enclosure (2), the Navy Personnel Command provided an
advisory opinion concluding that the evidence proffered by Petitioner
is insufficient to support the requested record change. The advisory
opinion points out the following evidence to support its position:

The Petitioner was automatically enrolled in the SBP as a result of
DFAS not receiving a valid SBP election. Furthermore, the
Petitioner's. spouse has been protected under the SBP since his date of
retirement and had he died during that period, she would have received
an SBP annuity. Nevertheless, the Petitioner may disenroll from the
SBP program during the one-year period beginning on the second
anniversary of the date of commencement of receiving retired pay.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
notwithstanding the opinion expressed in enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting corrective action. The
Board relied heavily on both notarized DD Forms 2656 provided by
Petitioner and SBP affidavit. Furthermore, the DD Form 2656 was
completed prior to Petitioner's retirement. The Board concluded that
the record should be changed to show that Petitioner made a proper and
timely request to decline SBP spouse coverage prior to his retirement.

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to
show that:

a. Prior to his 31 July 2013 transfer to the Fleet Reserve,
Petitioner declined enrollment in SBP with spousal concurrence. Any
other election or declination executed by Petitioner is null and void.

b. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.

4, Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
Docket No. NR7204-14

complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

 

5. The foregoing action of the Board is submitted for your review
and action.

10 Mar 15

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Reviewed and approved

HAE nb

ROBERT L. WOODS

Assistant General Counsel
(Manpower and Reserve Affairs)
1000 Navy Pentagon, Rm 4D548
Washington, DC 20350-1000

‘

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7914 14

    Original file (NR7914 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. The Board, consisting of mn Ey ad reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 23 March 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3406 13

    Original file (NR3406 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a} Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner declined enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). NR3406-13 d. Petitioner submitted a DD Form 2656 (SBP election) to DFAS dated 9 November 2012 signed by the Petitioner and his spouse declining SBP Spouse coverage. e. On 21 March 2013, the Petitioner submitted a DD...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08345 12

    Original file (08345 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 7 004 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 pyc Docket No. 8345-12 27 Aug 13 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy x Ref: {a) Title 10 U.9.c. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsaiman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 Bugust 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3501-13

    Original file (NR3501-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that prior to Petitioner’s retirement on 30 August 2012, he declined Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage with spousal concurrence. Docket No.NRO3501-13 b. Petitioner and his spouse married on on prior to the of his retirement, he submitted a DD Form 2656-2 (SBP Termination Request) seeking to decline SBP coverage. c,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5444 14

    Original file (NR5444 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter 'referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely written request for conversion from child only to- spouse and child coverage. k. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's application has commented to the effect that the request has no merit and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2537 13

    Original file (NR2537 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that prior to her transfer to the retirement list on 29 July 2012, she declined Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) category of coverage for “spouse” with spousal concurrence. Additionally, in the Petitioner's response to the A/O, she again asserts that she was not counseled prior to her retirement date that the SBP election...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04321-07

    Original file (04321-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    MAJORITY CONCLUSION:Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, a majority of the Board, consisting of Ms. Ballinger and Mr. Leeman, concludes that Petitioner’s request warrants favorable action. The majority finds that and his spouse did show a desire to decline SBP prior to retirement as evidenced by the DD Form 2656 filed in July 2006.MAJORITY RECOMMENDATION:That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:a. The foregoing action of the Board...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1945 14

    Original file (NR1945 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that prior to his transfer to the retirement list on 31 August 2009, he declined Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) category of coverage with spousal concurrence. e. On 17 November 2011, Petitioner stated he submitted a valid and timely request using the DD Form 2656, to the Defense Finance Accounting Service (DFAS) within the 25t...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3100-13

    Original file (NR3100-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAL, Sulre 100% ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2480 DIC Docket No. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Exnicios, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 August 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should pe taken on the available evidence of record. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1840 14

    Original file (NR1840 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    _ BPE RS DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BEOOre™s BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 761 S COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NRO1840-14 27 October 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW_OF NAVAL RECORD ICO q Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that, as...